Dear reader,
As recently nominated as Head of Research I want to thank you to bring your faithful interest in our quest about Tulse Luper’s suitcases. My new function allows me to freely extend my researches to foreign countries far from any administrative fuss, as long as I regularly report to the G.C.R.U. about my finds.
Without any deny of true respect for our close colleagues of the Research Department, a few of us, including Pat Fields, Richard Douglas and Jin Nami Huyen never subscribed to the Knockavelli thesis. The 16mm movie founded in suitcase 92 is obviously NOT an original, but a fiction filmed a posteriori. The content of all the other suitcases is always chronologically connected to Luper’s time, no matter how concrete or virtual it is.
On the other side the authenticity of suitcase 92 was clearly demonstrated and proved by many analyses. There is only one conclusion: the original content was removed from the suitcase, and replaced by this fiction movie. Why, who did it, where and what is or was the original artefact are the main questions related to this last found suitcase.
I am currently preparing my travel, selecting the locations I need to explore in order to get answers to these questions. For evident reasons, Sark Island and the desert of Moab will be important steps of my journey, but I also have to consider other places depending of the result of my researches.
I will further inform you about more concrete elements related to my travel.
Best regards,
Daniel Capelletti
Head of Research of the Global Connected Research Union
As recently nominated as Head of Research I want to thank you to bring your faithful interest in our quest about Tulse Luper’s suitcases. My new function allows me to freely extend my researches to foreign countries far from any administrative fuss, as long as I regularly report to the G.C.R.U. about my finds.
Without any deny of true respect for our close colleagues of the Research Department, a few of us, including Pat Fields, Richard Douglas and Jin Nami Huyen never subscribed to the Knockavelli thesis. The 16mm movie founded in suitcase 92 is obviously NOT an original, but a fiction filmed a posteriori. The content of all the other suitcases is always chronologically connected to Luper’s time, no matter how concrete or virtual it is.
On the other side the authenticity of suitcase 92 was clearly demonstrated and proved by many analyses. There is only one conclusion: the original content was removed from the suitcase, and replaced by this fiction movie. Why, who did it, where and what is or was the original artefact are the main questions related to this last found suitcase.
I am currently preparing my travel, selecting the locations I need to explore in order to get answers to these questions. For evident reasons, Sark Island and the desert of Moab will be important steps of my journey, but I also have to consider other places depending of the result of my researches.
I will further inform you about more concrete elements related to my travel.
Best regards,
Daniel Capelletti
Head of Research of the Global Connected Research Union